谈立峰, 孙樨陵, 许强强, 张启宁, 张云娣, 童玲, 翟成凯. 高校食堂工作人员公共营养知识、态度和行为的干预效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2015, 32(2): 128-131,135. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14257
引用本文: 谈立峰, 孙樨陵, 许强强, 张启宁, 张云娣, 童玲, 翟成凯. 高校食堂工作人员公共营养知识、态度和行为的干预效果评价[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2015, 32(2): 128-131,135. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14257
TAN Li-feng , SUN Xi-ling , XU Qiang-qiang , ZHANG Qi-ning , ZHANG Yun-di , TONG Ling , ZHAI Cheng-kai . Intervention Effect Evaluation on Public Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in College Canteen Staff[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2015, 32(2): 128-131,135. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14257
Citation: TAN Li-feng , SUN Xi-ling , XU Qiang-qiang , ZHANG Qi-ning , ZHANG Yun-di , TONG Ling , ZHAI Cheng-kai . Intervention Effect Evaluation on Public Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in College Canteen Staff[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2015, 32(2): 128-131,135. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14257

高校食堂工作人员公共营养知识、态度和行为的干预效果评价

Intervention Effect Evaluation on Public Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in College Canteen Staff

  • 摘要: 目的 了解高校食堂工作人员的公共营养知识、态度和行为的现状,评价开展以健康食堂为载体的营养健康促进模式的干预效果。

    方法 采取随机整群抽样,于2012年选取常州市创建健康食堂某高校的62名食堂工作人员为干预组,实施为期1年的以"健康食堂"为载体的营养健康促进干预;同时,另一所未采取任何干预措施的高校62名食堂工作人员为对照组。采用问卷调查,对两组人员分别在干预前(基线)、1年后,进行公共营养知识、态度和行为的调查,并通过干预前后的对比分析评价干预效果。

    结果 干预组和对照组食堂工作人员的公共营养知识、正向态度率、行为形成率基线水平分别为31.09%、33.87%,65.48%、68.06%,5.48%、9.03%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。1年后:干预组相应指标分别提升至71.86%、96.77%、91.29%,均高于干预前(P<0.05),亦高于对照组同期(P<0.05);而对照组各指标与基线水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

    结论 在单位食堂开展"健康食堂"的创建是实施营养健康促进工作的有效措施。

     

    Abstract: Objective To understand the situation on public nutrition knowledge, attitude, and practice of the college canteen staff, and to evaluate the effects of a nutritional health promotion model using healthy canteen as the carrier.

    Methods By random cluster sampling, 62 canteen staff from a pilot college running a healthy canteen project in Changzhou were selected as the intervention group in 2012; another 62 canteen staff from a college without taking any intervention measures were selected as the control group. All the staff completed a baseline and an after-one-year questionnaire about knowledge, attitude, and practice on public nutrition. The differences in the results of the two questionnaires were presented as the effect of the intervention program.

    Results At the baseline, the intervention group and the control group reported 31.09% and 33.87%, 65.48% and 68.06%, 5.48% and 9.03% for the awareness rate of public nutrition, positive attitude rate towards public nutrition, and positive behavior formation rate, respectively; no significant difference was identified in all these three indices (all P > 0.05). After the intervention program, the above three rates in the intervention group significantly increased to 71.86%, 96.77%, and 91.29% (all P<0.05). Moreover, the intervention group at the end of the intervention program presented higher rates of knowledge, attitude, and practice than the control group did (all P<0.05). No significant differences in all indices between before and after the intervention program were found in the control group (all P > 0.05).

    Conclusion It is an effective method to promote nutrition health by establishing healthy college canteens.

     

/

返回文章
返回