陈秀芹, 黄丽妹, 朱美英, 金克峙. 上海市松江区助动车道路交通伤害危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2016, 33(4): 361-366. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.15505
引用本文: 陈秀芹, 黄丽妹, 朱美英, 金克峙. 上海市松江区助动车道路交通伤害危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2016, 33(4): 361-366. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.15505
CHEN Xiu-qin, HUANG Li-mei, ZHU Mei-ying, JIN Ke-zhi. A Case-Control Study on Risk Factors of Road Traffic Crashes Involving Motorized Bicycles in Songjiang District, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2016, 33(4): 361-366. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.15505
Citation: CHEN Xiu-qin, HUANG Li-mei, ZHU Mei-ying, JIN Ke-zhi. A Case-Control Study on Risk Factors of Road Traffic Crashes Involving Motorized Bicycles in Songjiang District, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2016, 33(4): 361-366. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2016.15505

上海市松江区助动车道路交通伤害危险因素的病例对照研究

A Case-Control Study on Risk Factors of Road Traffic Crashes Involving Motorized Bicycles in Songjiang District, Shanghai

  • 摘要: 目的

    探讨影响助动车道路交通伤害的危险因素,为进一步开展道路交通伤害预防控制提供科学依据。

    方法

    采用病例对照研究方法,通过面对面问卷调查收集交通事故组、虚惊事故组和对照组助动车使用者的个人基本信息情况;交通安全相关的认知、态度、行为等问题;过去一年内发生交通事故或虚惊事故的情况。

    结果

    本研究共调查交通事故组127人,虚惊事故组149人,对照组406人。在控制年龄的情况下,影响交通事故发生的危险因素为文化程度低(OR=1.874,95% CI:1.110~3.164)和机动车道行驶(OR=1.829,95% CI:1.071~3.124);保护因素为上海本市户籍(OR=0.454,95% CI:0.285~0.725);影响虚惊事故发生的危险因素为逆向行驶(OR=1.870,95% CI:1.136~3.077)和机动车道行驶(OR=2.700,95% CI:1.646~4.431),保护因素为上海本市户籍(OR=0.468,95% CI:0.294~0.743)和睡眠充足(OR=0.574,95% CI:0.357~0.921)。

    结论

    文化程度低、非上海户籍、违反交通规则是助动车交通伤害的重要危险因素。应针对流动人口、文化程度较低者加强道路交通安全教育活动,积极引导助动车使用者改善驾驶危险行为、避免疲劳驾驶。

     

    Abstract: Objective

    To explore the risk factors of road traffic crashes (RTCs) involving motorized bicycles and provide scientific evidence for developing RTCs control and prevention programs.

    Methods

    A case-control design was applied in this survey. We collected data via face-to-face interview with motorized bicycle drivers of reported RTCs, near-miss RTCs, and control groups on general information; knowledge, attitude, and behaviors related to road safety; and experience of RTCs or near-miss RTCs in past one year.

    Results

    The study subjects consisted of a RTCs group (n=127), a near-miss RTCs group (n=149), and a control group (n=406). With age controlled, the risk factors for RTCs were lower education level (OR=1.874, 95% CI: 1.110-3.164) and using an inappropriate lane (1.829, 1.071-3.124); and protective factor was Shanghai local residence (0.454, 0.285-0.725). For near-miss RTCs, the risk factors were driving on the wrong-side (1.870, 1.136-3.077) and using an inappropriate lane (1.870, 1.136-3.077); and protective factors were Shanghai local residence (0.468, 0.294-0.743) and sufficient sleeping (0.574, 0.357-0.921).

    Conclusion

    The prevalence of RTCs involving motorized bicycles is modified by lower education level, non-Shanghai local residence, and traffic violation. We should prioritize allocation of safety education/intervention resources in migrant populations with low er education level to promote behavior changes in motorized bicycle riding.

     

/

返回文章
返回