18~60岁职业人群工作-家庭冲突与抑郁情绪的关系:生活压力的中介作用

Mediating role of life stress on correlation between work-family conflict and depressive mood of occupational population aged 18-60 years

  • 摘要:
    背景 职业人群抑郁情绪普遍存在,严重影响身心健康和社会经济发展,已成为亟须关注的公共卫生议题。
    目的 了解我国120市18~60岁职业人群的抑郁情绪现状,并探究工作-家庭冲突与抑郁情绪的关系以及生活压力在二者关系间的作用,为采取措施缓解职业人群抑郁情绪提供科学依据。
    方法 利用2021年中国居民心理与行为调查数据,选择18~60岁的职业人群作为研究对象,共有3875人纳入研究。采用《工作-家庭冲突量表》《主观生活压力量表》和《患者健康问卷抑郁量表》调查研究对象的工作-家庭冲突、生活压力和抑郁情绪情况。采用Harman单因子法检验调查数据是否存在共同方法偏差;运用单因素方差分析检验职业人群工作-家庭冲突、生活压力和抑郁情绪在不同个体特征的差异,用卡方检验分析抑郁情绪检出率的差异;采用偏相关分析各变量间的相关性;采用Process宏程序插件进行生活压力在工作家庭冲突与抑郁情绪间的中介效应检验。
    结果 职业人群的工作-家庭冲突、生活压力和抑郁情绪得分分别为(24.60±8.28)、(9.28±3.78)、(5.43±5.30)分。抑郁情绪的检出率为48.7%(1888/3875)。从不吸烟的职业人群的抑郁情绪得分显著高于吸烟的职业人群(P<0.01)。偏相关分析表明,工作-家庭冲突、生活压力与抑郁情绪呈正向相关(r=0.472、0.447,P<0.001);工作-家庭冲突与生活压力呈正向相关(r=0.361,P<0.001)。使用Process宏程序检验中介效应,结果显示:工作-家庭冲突对生活压力具有正向影响(b=0.361,P<0.001),生活压力对抑郁情绪有正向影响(b=0.318,P<0.001),工作-家庭冲突对抑郁情绪有正向影响作用(b=0.357,P<0.001),生活压力能够部分中介工作-家庭冲突对职业人群抑郁情绪的影响,中介效应值为0.115(95%CI:0.099~0.130),占总效应的24.36%。
    结论 工作-家庭冲突不仅可以直接影响职业人群的抑郁情绪,还可以通过生活压力的中介效应对抑郁情绪产生间接影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Depressive moods among occupational population are prevalent, which seriously affect their mental-physical health and socioeconomic productivity. This has become an urgent public health concern.
    Objective To understand current situation of depressive mood among an occupational population aged 18 to 60 covering 120 cities of China, and to explore the relationship between work-family conflict and depressive mood as well as the role of life stress in the relationship, as to provide a scientific basis for developing measures to reduce depressive mood in the occupational population.
    Methods Using the data of the Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents in 2021, an occupational population aged 18 to 60 years was selected as study subjects. A total of 3785 subjects were included in the study. The Work-Family Conflict Scale, Subjective Life Stress Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression Scale were used to assess the work-family conflict, life stress, and depressive mood of the subjects. Harman's single-factor method was used to evaluate common method bias in the survey data. One-way ANOVA was applied to test the difference in work-family conflict, life stress, and depressive mood among occupational population by demographic characteristics, and chi-square test was used to analyze the difference in reporting depressive mood. Partial correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between selected variables. Process plug-in was used to test potential mediating effect of life stress on work-family conflict and depressive emotion.
    Results The scores of work-family conflict, life stress, and depressive mood among the occupational population were 24.60±8.28, 9.28±3.78, and 5.43±5.30, respectively. The prevalence rates of depressive mood was 48.7% (1888/3875). The score of depressive mood among occupational population who never smoked was significantly higher than that of those who smoked (P<0.01). The partial correlation analysis showed that work-family conflict and life stress were positively correlated with depressive mood (r=0.472 and 0.447, P<0.001); work-family conflict was positively correlated with life stress (r=0.361, P<0.001). The mediation analysis results showed that work-family conflict positively associated with life stress (b=0.361, P<0.001); life stress positively associated with depressive mood (b=0.318, P<0.001); work-family conflict positively associated with depressive mood (b=0.357, P<0.001), and played a partial mediating role in the relationship between work-family conflict and depressive mood with an effect size of 0.115 (95%CI: 0.099, 0.130) that accounted for 24.36% of the total effect.
    Conclusion Work-family conflict may not only directly affect depressive mood among occupational population, but also indirectly affect depressive mood through a mediating effect of life stress.

     

/

返回文章
返回